We have identified a major normalized wrong of our time and we want to change it peacefully. People should understand VALUE and APPRECIATION beyond physical input. There are millions of uncompensated implemented opinions that may worth billions of dollars. The reality is nothing is free . The so called “free things” are just shifted cost, shifted reward, or stolen reward . Should poor employees surrender million dollar opinions to the rich employers? Shouldn't we encourage thinking by compensating valuable thoughts? Please read and donate your time and/or money to change history. 

Please join us on facebook Please support www.Adfec.info

Smoke-up Sunday,July 29, 2012 - downtown in your City at 4:20pm

"The beauty of this proposal is not something we can precisely imagine – this is about improving minds more than the emphasized compensation."

Rewarding Implemented Workplace Opinions .

Unlike toothpaste, OPINIONS are so precious that virtually every company offers an opinion box or collect opinions in other ways. The wide gap, in power, between the employer and the employee makes it a social responsibility for governments to spearhead and intervene for an acceptable relationship. It is overdue to encourage compensation of implemented opinions.

The management and senior staffs are generally paid more than regular general laborers due to the value in thinking, a parent branch of opinion. However, some valuable opinions do come from the junior staffs and is hardly rewarded beyond “thank you.”

Whereas some opinions worth less than thank you, some opinions may worth millions. Society should not encourage “free things” especially against the weaker party (employees). We ought to evolve from the illussory western saying, “best things are free” -- repent beyond “sorry” on horrible acts and be grateful beyond “thank you” on “best things.” Some 'free things' may fall under OK or even good but best things are never free, nor can "free things" yield best way. The reality is nothing is free . The so called “free things” are just shifted cost, shifted reward, or stolen reward . Until we encourage opinion compensation, company owners and senior staffs will swindle opinion dues through our effortless standing. Our collective duty is to minimize injustice and our inaction on opinion compensation is too shameful for our era. Consultants can charge high fees for advice (opinions) that may never be implemented, we normalized executive bonuses and other things -- it's time to appreciate junior employees with convincing implemented suggestions of high value.

I am not calling for opinions to be treated as intellectual property but for society, especially at the workplace, to embrace a culture of compensating implemented opinions. In north America we have the Better Business Bureau which is primarily for consumer interest. We need a similar bureau for Implemented Employee Opinions (www.mbioc.net) and to look after the welfare of workers in other respects.

By spearheading such a bureau, companies can voluntarily join and to abide by the rules of let say 'Bureau for Employee Compensation' (BEC) – I changed the name to MBIOC. The rules and policies of such a bureau may change over time but I just want to give the general idea I envisioned for such a bureau. Companies will be required to declare a pledged compensation range, pay a reasonable minimal annual fee, and/or five percent of compensated amounts to brag as a member of BEC. This will attract and encourage employees to diligently serve beyond opinions. In return, companies will improve through healthy competition and our social trusteeship will improve. We will minimize employee disappointment and boost work efficiency among other things. Imagine working for a company with a verifiable record average of $500 monthly opinion compensation, or $10,000 yearly or once paid a lump sum of $200,000.00 to an employee for an opinion. Imagine the caring trust such verifiable record can build and the efforts it could yield.

The relationship between employees and MBIOC will be as simple as forwarding suggested opinions through fax or e-mail for example stating the present method and the suggested method. Indeed, it should be properly archived but no one at www.MBIOC.NET should bother reading any opinion. www.MBIOC.NET should focus on implemented opinions, not submitted opinions. The companies will notify www.MBIOC.NET of implemented opinions and paid compensation amount. So www.MBIOC.NET will issue companies an annual report that will detail necessary figures including pledged range and actually paid range for employees to have an idea of their employers' bragging rights. Suppose a suggestion (opinion) is implemented and not reported by the member company, then the employee can contact www.MBIOC.NET. Mbioc will investigate, negotiate for compensation and if necessary compensate the employee through our insurance policy. Mbioc will not take companies to court but will use public shaming against guilty companies.

The beauty of this proposal is not something we can precisely imagine – this is about improving minds more than the emphasized compensation. Almost every company I worked for, I have suggested something valuable to them but I actually withheld more than I shared opinions. Why would I suggest something I believe is worth hundred thousand dollars to a company that pays me less than $20 per hour? Only those who doesn't not know undeserved rewarding is somewhere undeserved punishment knowingly or unknowingly will do such a thing. I hereby urge people to refrain from submitting certain suggestions until such a bureau is accomplished and your employer happen to be a member. The Government knows how cruel the powerful can be, that's why we have minimum wage and ther things like health care culture--but we need to open a door for a limitless wage/compensation for trying junior employees. I am a perfect example of a junior employee with brilliant ideas and 'Capitalism' is failing me. We all know the reason behind suggestion boxes at the workplace is beyond complaints. Like plagiarism, we know some management staff present suggestions as their own and argue for compensation, raise, and/or praises. We know that millions of people are underemployed and may be smarter than their bosses. We know that thinking or even experience is different from education. Why should we choose inaction considering these facts?

The media and politicians should embrace this plan more than many minor issues. This happens to be an election year in the U.S and Canada --embracing the idea can surely court voters, which may inspire other countries. The conscientious lawyers and social leaders should push for its establishment. Even some millionaires can try it as a private business – (sorry! I opened www.mbioc.net after no response). I am pretty optimistic that companies will pay millions or multiple hundred thousand dollars to be on record standing. This means more minds to expect elevation through working... more than gambling on lotteries or resorting to crimes. There are many other things I believe such a bureau can do for the general workers, some of which I do not want to detail at the moment.

Politicians who argue “tax break” for the poor should not skip rewarding unpaid input like implemented opinions. And politicians who argue for the rich based on input are shamefully skipping such valuable input. It is time to repent and embrace such a noble idea. The trying poor should understand no form of tax break is comparable to the possibility of rising through deserved input by simply suggesting an enhanced method of working. We cannot applaud successful consultants who earn millions on advice that may never be implemented as 'hard workers' and ignore junior employees with implemented opinions through inaction. Eventually, companies will skip consultants to stealing opinion dues due to our inaction and conformity. I doubt if anyone dare question that there are millions of implemented workplace opinions that are hardly compensated. The few that may claim to be compensating with 'pizza, cigarette, and beer' must understand the importance of verifiable records and establishing it as culture for the non-compensating ones. No good person should question the need for such a bureau. Some people and companies may resist like the days of physical slavery but to their disgrace and awaiting punishment. Some people and companies will eventually understand justice, the wrongs of our times, like the 'good white people' who fought along blacks to abolish physical slavery as norm. We must sensitize employees to work with willing companies against unwilling companies.

Presently, the company I work for is a multi-million dollar company under a multi-Billion dollar franchise. Although I have co-workers who earn over ten thousand dollar a month, I make what I consider near minimum wage. Regardless of our size and how much they value me, I do have suggestions that I can mathematically prove on a cost/income value of over hundred thousand dollars per year. Our company owners are multi-millionaires making profit. Why should I give a million dollar “free” opinion to such a company? Some executives will be taking my due reward while society blames me for my condition. I know if a Bureau like mbioc.net existed and well promoted, our company will be a member and I will gladly give opinions that will help them and help me rise beyond this company.

People should understand VALUE and APPRECIATION beyond physical input. Should poor employees surrender million dollar opinions to the rich employers? Shouldn't we encourage thinking by compensating valuable thoughts? Some low minded people may argue we cannot value opinions even though we often read in newspapers that put monetary value on human lives based on where you live. Obviously, it is not hard to put a value to a whole company, a sub-company or a branch of a company.

So to compensate opinions, I recommend 10 to 50% of the annual differential value. For example if your company or one machine is being operated in a manner to produce 10 products per year of let say windows and you show them how to produce 15 windows per year – you deserve to be compensated 10- 50% of the annual value of 5 windows. At least 50% should go to business and the value in subsequent years as well. It may seem unfair to those who never owned a business but I truly care for workers as evident in my call for this movement. Companies will also reserve the right to advance just the minimum annual value after implementation. and if another employee comes-up with a better system within six months – the first employee will be assessed for possible final compensation.

Like any other plan, this plan has it pros and possible cons but it is certainly in the best interest of the employees, employers, and society if properly executed. I can defend any worry people may have about this plan and will address the most probable fear to crop up. An overflow of opinions? Perhaps in the beginning but it is still advantageous to the companies. When people make “dumb” suggestions, that is an opportunity improve a faulty but willing mind. Employees will understand why things are done in a certain way.

Obviously, there are companies that reward thinkers by buying beer, promotion etc but there are many companies that induce million dollar ideas with “thank you” to eventually fire the employee on flimsy issues. Even with the few caring employers,If the employee is not charismatic enough or educated enough – there is near zero chances of rising meaningfully. In a nutshell, an implemented valuable opinion should be rewarded and the best way is to have a third party verifiable records of compensation.

Like copyright infringement and plagiarism, this is a question of efforts and conscience for the trying weak we ought to help and protect. I may not be in the position to negotiate especially with someone who thinks I am worth $9 or $25 per hour and be fired at will. I will take “thank you” for some opinions, but I want hundred dollars for some opinions and lot more for special opinions that may worth millions. It is about valuing thoughts to uplift employees, employers, and society. May God bless Showlove Trinity: Let's learn, let's work, let's have fun. 

By jigster, An African Philosopher

Marijuana Protest: Smoke-up Sunday, July 29, 2012

Avoiding English as weapon -- Speak English Please and the letter to Doctors and employers

The Most Fatuous First Bill Of All Times?

DirectBuy: The Worse Allowed Scam?

Blueprint of Decriminalized but Controlled and Accessible Marijuana

Contrasting Two Multi-Billion Dollar Companies.

Bribed Cop(s) or Faulty system ?

Censor, Bribed Cops, or faulty System (part 2)

How Governments are failing Retailers

Decriminalize or Legalize Marijuana?

How and Why Drug Money is exaggerated ?

Stop pre-employment Drug Tests

Comparison chart between criminalization, legalization, and decriminalization of marijuana

The Evil direction Apple is heading To

Defending Marijuana Religiously: Islam, Christianity, Judaism, and beyond

Time is God's secret, too deep for humans
Yes time will subdue but Justice must yield first
Even Love yield to understand time
Time is “three days”, the mystery to one eye
Focus or ignore to be surprised with Justice
Focus on love and Justice or be lost in time
Time is the when to demystify how and why
To show you who or where to place what
It hates naivety... almost as cruelty
Time is the intervention after power distribution
As we can seek power, so we can bring time
But our limitation to time is like the mystery in growing
Time is the reason tolerance includes learning
To improve and understand choice without justifying
As when can't never replace how and why
Or why children outsmart, sick or die before adults
Time is the interest that warrants heaven and hell
Time impregnates... plants, animals, and humans
Time reduces reactionary choices in deflections... and mercy
Time is God's secret, too deep for humans.

Inconsistent Employer by Jigster

S/he claims my opinions are so valuable ...
But s/he mistreats me and sucks my opinion dues
S/he claims mental superiority with my bosses
And force me to accept underemployment as “favor”
S/he rightly condemn stealing $1 value pen
But S/he sucks million dollar opinions indifferently
Then S/he told me is optional like a battered wife ....
So S/he stole input from a retarded volunteer
Then S/he started to preach me about appreciation
And demanded I should beg her with opinions
S/he hired a charismatic slave driver, licensed by governments
Then admits Capitalism values input except employee opinions
S/he told me to hope and conform like a “house negro”
Then commanded me to report any stealing as intolerable
So I asked her if it includes opinion dues
S/he said it depends on position, position, and position
S/he claims opinions are hard to value
Thus s/he can estimate a whole company value, not an aspect
So my opinions are valuable and invaluable but valueless
'Please speak-up against stealing except opinion dues'
Who will stand for my implemented opinions? 

“No one can serve two masters” like asking and begging
Leaning defines who -- as composition defines what
The pious will ask and don't mind to be asked
The heathens will beg because they love to be begged
The pious cherish humility thus encourage asking
The heathens resent humility thus discourage asking
The pious avoid arrogance, so they frown at begging
The heathens compromise arrogance, so they trade with begging
The pious naturally encourage learning, and welcome all questions
The heathens reflexively thwart learning and accuse “stupid questions”
The pious are grateful for yes or no, thus bravely ask
The heathens just want yes , thus cowardly beg
The pious sincerely help with yes or no and explain after no
The heathens tradingly help with yes or no and complain after no
The pious ask and don't complain to be helped or after helping
The heathens beg with complain to be helped and after helping
The pious will sincerely serve with a smile and without complain
The heathens may serve with fake smiles but will complain after
The pious are open-minded and teach about the beauty in asking
The heathens transfuse fear to insinuate and smear against asking
The pious resolve problems by asking and advising... transparently
The heathens amplify problems through begging and gossiping detachedly
The pious are content, welcome asking and refrain beggars
The heathens are greedy, insist for begging and pressure non-beggars
The pious don't impose and will not punish non-asking suspects
The heathens impose begging and punish non-beggars
The pious are cautious about begging to avoid greed and arrogance
The heathens are reckless about begging to promote greed and arrogance
The pious bravely ask, contently ask, and humbly ask
The heathens cowardly beg..., greedily beg..., and arrogantly beg...
The pious ask to teach..., ask to serve..., and ask to promote fun...
The heathens beg in indoctrination, beg to get by, and beg to excel by deceit
The pious respect choice and respect others regardless of power
The heathens idolize power and discriminate based on power
The pious should wise-up, get proactive, and discourage begging
The heathens should cut their loses, repent, and affiliate asking
“No one can serve two masters” like asking and begging
Leaning defines who -- as composition defines what.